пользователей: 30398
предметов: 12406
вопросов: 234839
Конспект-online
РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ ЭКСКУРСИЯ

Grammatical category, meaning and form.

Grammatical category is regarded by many linguists as a two-fold unity of grammatical meaning and grammatical form.

 

Grammatical form is a sum of all the means employed to render this or that grammatical meaning. There are two main types of form-building: synthetic and analytical:

e. g. foot - feet, wife - wives, to sing - sang - sung;

 

The way of building of grammatical forms depends on the structure of the language. In a Synthetic  language – with the help of inflections (first example – всё в одном и том же слове). Analytical – with the help of axillary verbs (составное сказуемое).

Synthetic forms are built up by a change in the body of the word: affixation and sound transformation (interchange). The latter is not a productive means of word building in modern English, though in Old English it played an important role.

Synthetic tenses – Present Simple, Past Simple.

 

As for analytical forms, there are several interpretations. Some linguists think that analytical forms consist of at least two words: one referring to the grammatical meaning, the other – to the lexical one. Traditionally analytical form is defined as a unity of a notional word and an auxiliary.

 

Tense and aspect forms (the Continuous form: I am writing, The perfect form: I have written, etc.);

The Passive Voice: I was invited to the theatre;

The analytical form of the Subjunctive Mood: I should go there if I had time.

 

Grammatical meaning is closely connected with lexical meaning but is more abstract as it concerns not with meanings of separate words but with meanings characteristic of whole classes of words.

 

Each part of speech has a specific set of grammatical meanings. An English noun has the grammatical meanings of case, number.

 

 

Suppletive formations.

 

- building a form of a word from an altogether different stem.

I - me; go-went; good-better.

 

2. The Rules of the Sequence of Tenses.

The tense of a verb in the subordinate clause changes in accordance with the tense of the verb in the main clause.

The basic rules are as follows:

Rule 1

If the verb in the principal clause is in the present or the future tense, the verb in the subordinate clause may be in any tense, depending upon the sense to be expressed.

He says that he is fine.
He says that he was fine.
He says that he will be fine.
He will say that he is fine.
He will say that he was fine.
He will say that he will be fine.

Rule 2

If the tense in the principal clause is in the past tense, the tense in the subordinate clause will be in the corresponding past tense.

He said that he would come.
He told me that he had been ill.
I knew that he would not pass.
We noticed that the fan had stopped.

There are, nevertheless, a few exceptions to this rule.

A past tense in the main clause may be followed by a present tense in the subordinate clause when the subordinate clause expresses some universal truth.

Copernicus proved that the earth moves round the sun.
The teacher told us that honesty is the best policy.
He told me that the Hindus burn their dead.

A subordinate clause expressing place, reason or comparison may be in any tense, according to the sense to be expressed.

He didn’t get the job because his English isn’t good.
A fishing village once existed where now lies the city of Mumbai.

If the subordinate clause is an adjective clause, it may be in any tense as is required by the sense.

Yesterday I met a man who sells balloons.
Yesterday I met a man who sold me a balloon.

Rule 3

Note that when the subordinate clause is introduced by the conjunction of purpose that, the following rules are observed.

We use may in the subordinate clause when the main clause is in the present tense. We use might in the subordinate clause when the main clause is in the past tense.

I study that I may pass.
I will study that I may pass.
I studied that I might pass.
We eat that we may live.
He ate that he might not die.

Rule 4

If the principal clause is in the future tense, we do not use future tense in subordinating clauses beginning with when, until, before, after etc.

I will call you when dinner is ready. (NOT I will call you when dinner will be ready.)
I shall wait until you return. (NOT I shall wait until you will return.)

Rule 5

Expressions such as as if, if only, it is time and wish that are usually followed by past tenses.

I wish I was a bit taller.
It is time we started working.
He talks as if he knew everything.


 

3. Analyze the sentences.

 


20.06.2014; 00:54
хиты: 134
рейтинг:0
Гуманитарные науки
лингвистика и языки
языки
для добавления комментариев необходимо авторизироваться.
  Copyright © 2013-2024. All Rights Reserved. помощь